New York Times Staff Survey Shows Nearly Half Don’t Think ‘Free Exchange Of Views’ Welcome - Forbes

sutitong.blogspot.com

Topline

Even before controversies in recent weeks over New York Times management’s handling of free speech issues, according to a New York Post report published Saturday, only 51% of Times employees agreed in a company survey that "there is a free exchange of views in this company; people are not afraid to say what they really think.”

Key Facts

The Post, which claimed to have viewed the findings, said that Times' executives characterized the 51% figure as 10% lower than the "benchmark."

The Times internal assessment reportedly states that "although the majority of us feel well-informed," many staffers "indicated that differing viewpoints aren't sought or valued in our work.”

Forbes has reached out to the New York Times for comment but did not immediately hear back.

Crucial Quote:

"We saw steep declines in answers about leaders and colleagues accepting and embracing differences in race, gender, identity and religion. Responses from Black and Latino colleagues declined at an even greater rate," the Times internal assessment reportedly advised.

Key Background:

News of the poll comes at a time when recent reports describe Times staff as “largely divided” over recent staff controversies. In late January, The Daily Beast reported that high-profile health reporter Donald McNeil Jr. had used a racial slur during a Times-sponsored trip to Peru for high school students in 2019. TheTimes soon acknowledged that McNeil "had used bad judgment by repeating a racist slur in the context of a conversation about racist language" and had punished him, but decided not to fire him. In early February, more than 150 Times staffers "outraged" because they felt managers didn't take the incident seriously enough, sent a letter to publisher A.G. Sulzberger, and Times executives reportedly responded by promising to "examine the way we manage behavioral problems among members of the staff.” Last week, McNeil, who had anchored the paper's coverage of the coronavirus pandemic and had been with the paper for 45 years, abruptly announced he was leaving, and it was largely assumed he was pushed out. "We do not tolerate racist language regardless of intent," the Times wrote in an email—which they later walked back during a staff meeting Also last week, Andy Mills, a co-creator of the Daily podcast and a producer and co-host of the Caliphate podcast (which the Times was forced to partially retract), departed from the company in the wake of past accusations of inappropriate behavior toward female colleagues. In mid-January, Lauren Wolfe, an editor working at the Times, tweeted that she had “chills” watching President-elect Joe Biden’s plane land outside Washington, DC. She was fired less than two days later.

Big Number:

74%. That's the percentage of Times employees that said leaders and colleagues accepted and embraced differences in ethnicity/race, which, according to the Post, represented a 10% decline from the results of the same question in 2019.

Tangent:

Last June, there was a "staff-wide uproar" after the Times published an op-ed written by Sen, Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), in which he called for the deployment of troops to quell Black Lives Matter protests related to George Floyd's death. Nikole Hannah-Jones, the creator of the paper's 1619 project, said she was "deeply ashamed" the paper published the op-ed. In response, after initially defending the post, the Times released a statement asserting that “a rushed editorial process led to the publication of an Op-Ed that did not meet our standards." Opinion editor James Bennet, who defended the post initially, saying it was important to hear from all points of view, exited the Times later that month.